Bruce Robinson • The Peculiar Memories of Thomas Penman The Peculiar Memories of Thomas Penman by Bruce Robinson
Publisher: Harper Perennial
Year: 2000
Pages: 288
Terry Pratchett • The Color of Magic The Color of Magic by Terry Pratchett
Publisher: Colin Smythe
Year: 1989
Pages: 205
Bill Maher • New Rules New Rules by Bill Maher
Publisher: Rodale Books
Year: 2005
Pages: 230
Will Clarke • Lord Vishnu's Love Handles Lord Vishnu's Love Handles by Will Clarke
Publisher: Simon and Schuster
Year: 2005
Pages: 304
Steven D. Levitt • Freakonomics Freakonomics by Steven D. Levitt
Publisher: William Morrow
Year: 2005
Pages: 242
Bruce Campbell • Make Love the Bruce Campbell Way Make Love the Bruce Campbell Way by Bruce Campbell
Publisher: Thomas Dunne Books
Year: 2005
Pages: 320
Brian S. McWilliams • Spam Kings Spam Kings by Brian S. McWilliams
Publisher: O'Reilly Media
Year: 2004
Pages: 256
Chris Mooney • The Republican War on Science The Republican War on Science by Chris Mooney
Publisher: Basic Books
Year: 2005
Pages: 342
Kurt Vonnegut • The Slaughterhouse-Five The Slaughterhouse-Five by Kurt Vonnegut
Publisher: Dell
Year: 1991
Pages: 224
Nick Hornby • High Fidelity High Fidelity by Nick Hornby
Publisher: Riverhead
Year: 1996
Pages: 336

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

§549 · April 1, 2005 · Tags: , , , ·

9 Comments to “52 Books in 52 Weeks, 2005”

  1. Brady says:

    Did you raid my bookshelf? Because if you haven’t yet, I’ve got the Russel book and Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.

  2. Ben says:

    Yeah, that’s where I got them from. I’ll also probably read the philosophy of the Matrix book.

  3. sasha says:

    hi, found this site searching something on google, but aynways, ive read a book on the philosophy of the matrix, and if youre talking about the same one, it wasn’t very good. Some good points in teh beginning, but the rest of the book is really repetitive.
    anyways, cool site

  4. […] Following the lead of Heliologue, who is himself following Jason at Negro, Please, I will also make a move to read 52 books in 52 weeks and review them. It will be monstrous but I admit that I will enjoy it. Plus, it will – or at least should – motivate me to keep the site updated frequently with my musings. […]

  5. no need to study the philosophy of the Matrix, it can all be summed up in one concise story:

    Plato’s Parable of the Cave (Also known as the Allegory of the Cave)

    That’s it and that’s all. Though, that paved the way for many future philosophic/psychoanalytic theories—Like Althusser’s Ideolgical States and Ideological State Apparatusses, or Lacan’s “Mirror Stage as a Formative Function of the I”

  6. Ben says:

    If that were true, the series wouldn’t have been as bad as it was. The problem was, they started with Plato’s cave allegory, but then threw in an omnium gatherum of other, unrelated philosophies.

  7. grindbastard says:

    The problem with the philosophy of the Matrix is that not everyone is a raging pothead and therefore won’t find it so mind blowing.

  8. Ben says:

    “Like, what if the world we think we see… [dramatic pause] isn’t there?”

    “Dude, that’s deep.”

  9. david says:

    i always thought the “deeper” philosophy of the matrix were the moral implications of artificial intelligence.

    if you create self-aware, free-will beings such as the computer programs, beings that can see the wrongness/rightness of their actions (think the program at the train station who makes sacrifices for his daughter-program in order to give her a better “life”/existence), then this “artificial” intelligence would have the same moral value as a human being. that’s why the movies had to end with the “copout” resolution of peace. for either side, humans or machines,to wipe out the other would be to commit genocide in a sense. to create artificial intelligence—truly self-aware artificial intelligence—would be to create something on an equal metaphysical plane of existence with ourselves.

    would we be gods? perhaps.

    and if that’s true, kind of gives you a whole new perspective on what happens after death. pull the plug on a “computer program,” and we all know it ceases to be. pull the plug on a human? philosophers and theologians have been guessing at that for… well, forever.

Leave a Reply