Posts tagged `technology`

I find myself in downtown Philadelphia, staring at the window of the Cathedral-Basilica of Sts. Peter & Paul. I am a long way from my hometown, a smallish suburb of Chicago, feeling at odds with Philadelphia’s large stature—the sixth most populous city in the entire United States—and my own touristy insignificance.

I took a picture of the Liberty Bell earlier, but it was a mere formality: the bell, in real life, was smaller, duller, and much less impressive than I realized. Congress Hall, too, was neat but tidily boring. I thought of the Nick Cage vehicle filmed in next-door Independence Hall and can’t help but think it’s all been trivialized to the point where it’s impossible to care.

Read more…

§3702 · March 22, 2009 · 3 comments · Tags: , ,

Daemon Daemon by Daniel Suarez
Publisher: Dutton
Year: 2008
Pages: 432

Daemon is something of a success story. Initially self-published under a pseudonym, the book apparently got so much good press from blogs and tech websites like Wired that it earned itself a real publication deal with Dutton. I first learned of it from a book review on Slashdot and immediately related to the idea that geeks want realism in their fictional technology. Most recently, this is evidenced in an almost parodied fashion by Live Free or Die Hard, but you can see it in just about every film that references technology. It’s especially bad in big-budget summer blockbusters: Jeff Goldblum hacking an alien mothership with a Powerbook; the 3D “Unix” in Jurassic Park, or Hugh Jackman as the most BS-laden “hacker” in the history of movie hackers.

Daemon proposes to be a techno-thriller written by a techie for techies. How could it possibly go wrong?

Read more…

§3657 · March 9, 2009 · 5 comments · Tags: , , , ,

FLAC is a cross-platform codec, but when it comes to Windows, one has a pretty wide range of compiles. Some are more optimized than others.

I first got the idea for this benchmark when I stumbled upon a native 64-bit FLAC executable for Windows. Curious, I did a quick and dirty test against the canonical build for Windows and found that while encoding times were similar, decoding times were considerably faster.

To figure out why this is so (the 64-bitness or something else), I quickly pulled some some additional compiles and benchmarked them against a few different samples.

Read more…

§3477 · December 21, 2008 · 3 comments · Tags: , , , , ,

octothorpe
n. A name for the hash or square symbol (#), used mainly in telephony and computing

If you’re like most people, you’ve perhaps never even heard of the word “octothorpe.” If you aren’t American, you’ve almost certainly never used the term, and likely rarely hear it in polite conversation. Even among the people who originated the term, “octothorpe” is one of those curious linguistic complexities quickly replaced by coarser variations such as “hash,” “pound sign,” and “number sign.”

Yes, curiously enough, “octothorpe” is the term for the # sign common to all keyboards and touchtone phones. Moreover, it’s acquired a slew of variant spellings, likely due to the way in which speech naturally garbles its constituent parts: it’s known variably as octothorp, octothorpe, octathorp, octatherp, octothorn, and octalthorpe. In fact, as sources document, its origins aren’t at all clear. We may surmise relatively easily the octo- portion, but the variant thorp[e]/thorn/therp is attributed to any one of a number of shibboleths, inside jokes, and arbitrary euphonia. The term, like the symbol’s use within Telecom, like originated somewhere within Bell Labs, along with its sibling symbol, the asterisk, one of two non-alphanumeric symbols which have risen to prominence via touchtone phones. Whatver its origin, this particular synonym has fallen distinctly out of favor, even in its ostensible country of origin—the official Unicode designation for the character is “number sign.”

Its origin has been described separately by Ralph Carlsen as being a combination of “eight-pointed” and the last name of Olympian Jim Thorpe (and spelled “octothorpe”). Donald Kerr, supposedly part of (in charge of?) the committee at Bell in charge of choosing and naming the non-numeric symbols to be used on Bell’s phones, claims that two former colleagues coined “octatherp” as a joke.

The asterisk, at least etymologically, has a much clearer lineage: it’s from the Greek ἀστερίσκος, by way of the Latin asteriscum (“little star”). Some sources date its use typographically to the beginnings of the printed word, when it was used to denotes dates of birth. In various cultures and alphabets, the “star” character appears, though it has different meanings depending on where you find it. It, too, was co-opted as a symbol of the first touchtone telephone, alongside its eight-pointed friend, though of course it has garnered specific meanings in every industry: in programming, it’s considered a “wildcard”; similarly, it has a slew of separate meanings in mathematical notation. Because the the word asterisk’s relative complexity in pronunciation, it’s generally been referred to as a “star,” especially in the context of phones.

§3039 · November 12, 2008 · (No comments) · Tags: , , ,

Andrew Keen has no idea how open models work.

In his latest article, he pontificates that the recent economic downturn is a death knell for community-supported or community-built programs/sites/&c.

So how will today’s brutal economic climate change the Web 2.0 “free” economy? It will result in the rise of online media businesses that reward their contributors with cash; it will mean the success of Knol over Wikipedia, Mahalo over Google, TheAtlantic.com over the HuffingtonPost.com, iTunes over MySpace, Hulu over YouTube Inc., Playboy.com over Voyeurweb.com, TechCrunch over the blogosphere, CNN’s professional journalism over CNN’s iReporter citizen-journalism… The hungry and cold unemployed masses aren’t going to continue giving away their intellectual labor on the Internet in the speculative hope that they might get some “back end” revenue. “Free” doesn’t fill anyone’s belly; it doesn’t warm anyone up.

There are really two broad fallacies that need addressing here. The first is Keen’s use of the word “open source,” which here is a misnomer. He never mentions Linux, Apache, or other open source programs which always have and will continue to have a dedicated base of programmers, most of whom work on it in their spare time, without any remuneration except personal pride and the esteem of their peers. It need hardly be noted that an economic downtown is likely to increase interest in open-source software, as it likely reduces operating costs for businesses.

Read more…

§2907 · October 22, 2008 · 1 comment · Tags: , , , , , ,