Posts tagged `memes`

The “Impending tryptophan” edition

  1. Liquid Tension Experiment – [Liquid Tension Experiment #11] Three Minute Warning Pt. III
  2. Paatos – [Silence Of Another Kind #06] Procession Of Fools
  3. The Flower Kings – [Unfold The Future CD1 #01] The Truth Will Set You Free
  4. Insomnium – [Above the weeping world #07] Last statement
  5. Foo Fighters – [In Your Honour CD2 #10] Razor
  6. Blindside – [A Thought Crushed My Mind #11] Nothing But Skin
  7. The Tea Party – [Seven Circles #03] One Step Closer Away
  8. Kayo Dot – [Choirs Of The Eye #02] A Pitcher Of Summer
  9. In Flames – [The Jester Race / Black Ash Inheritance #11] Goliaths Disarm Their Davids
  10. Anton Bruckner – [Symphonie Nr. 7 / Te Deum CD2 #07] Te Deum – IV – Salvum fac. Mooderato – Allegro moderato
§3344 · November 21, 2008 · 1 comment · Tags: , ,

The “Happy Birthday, Mom” edition.

  1. Ulver – [Perdition City #09] Nowhere/Catastrophe
  2. Jeff Buckley – [Sketches for My Sweetheart the Drunk CD2 #07] Gunshot Glitter
  3. Brian McBride – [When the Detail Lost Its Freedom #09] The Guilt Of Uncomplicated Thoughts
  4. Craig Armstrong – [As If To Nothing #04] Amber
  5. Soilwork – [A Predator's Portrait #07] Structure Divine
  6. Aaron Copland – [Early Orchestral Works, 1922-1935 CD1 #02] Dance Symphony- 2. Andante moderato
  7. Extol – [Undeceived #11] Abandoned
  8. Robert Simpson – [Symphony No. 9 #17] 17
  9. System of a Down – [Hypnotize #12] Soldier Side
  10. Nine Inch Nails – [Ghosts I-IV CD1 #01] Ghosts I
§3342 · November 14, 2008 · (No comments) · Tags: , ,

octothorpe
n. A name for the hash or square symbol (#), used mainly in telephony and computing

If you’re like most people, you’ve perhaps never even heard of the word “octothorpe.” If you aren’t American, you’ve almost certainly never used the term, and likely rarely hear it in polite conversation. Even among the people who originated the term, “octothorpe” is one of those curious linguistic complexities quickly replaced by coarser variations such as “hash,” “pound sign,” and “number sign.”

Yes, curiously enough, “octothorpe” is the term for the # sign common to all keyboards and touchtone phones. Moreover, it’s acquired a slew of variant spellings, likely due to the way in which speech naturally garbles its constituent parts: it’s known variably as octothorp, octothorpe, octathorp, octatherp, octothorn, and octalthorpe. In fact, as sources document, its origins aren’t at all clear. We may surmise relatively easily the octo- portion, but the variant thorp[e]/thorn/therp is attributed to any one of a number of shibboleths, inside jokes, and arbitrary euphonia. The term, like the symbol’s use within Telecom, like originated somewhere within Bell Labs, along with its sibling symbol, the asterisk, one of two non-alphanumeric symbols which have risen to prominence via touchtone phones. Whatver its origin, this particular synonym has fallen distinctly out of favor, even in its ostensible country of origin—the official Unicode designation for the character is “number sign.”

Its origin has been described separately by Ralph Carlsen as being a combination of “eight-pointed” and the last name of Olympian Jim Thorpe (and spelled “octothorpe”). Donald Kerr, supposedly part of (in charge of?) the committee at Bell in charge of choosing and naming the non-numeric symbols to be used on Bell’s phones, claims that two former colleagues coined “octatherp” as a joke.

The asterisk, at least etymologically, has a much clearer lineage: it’s from the Greek ἀστερίσκος, by way of the Latin asteriscum (“little star”). Some sources date its use typographically to the beginnings of the printed word, when it was used to denotes dates of birth. In various cultures and alphabets, the “star” character appears, though it has different meanings depending on where you find it. It, too, was co-opted as a symbol of the first touchtone telephone, alongside its eight-pointed friend, though of course it has garnered specific meanings in every industry: in programming, it’s considered a “wildcard”; similarly, it has a slew of separate meanings in mathematical notation. Because the the word asterisk’s relative complexity in pronunciation, it’s generally been referred to as a “star,” especially in the context of phones.

§3039 · November 12, 2008 · (No comments) · Tags: , , ,

The “On the road again” edition

  1. Rachmaninov, Sergei – [Piano Concerto No.2, Paganini Rhapsody (Lang Lang) #28] Rhapsody on a Theme of Paganini op. 43/ Variation XXIII. L’istesso tempo
  2. Tori Amos – [Scarlet's Walk #03] Wednesday
  3. The Cardigans – [Long Gone Before Daylight #06] Please Sister
  4. Nine Inch Nails – [Ghosts I-IV CD1 #07] Ghosts I
  5. Do Make Say Think – [Winter Hymn Country Hymn Secret Hymn #04] Outer Inner & Secret
  6. Jason Mraz – [We Sing, We Dance, We Steal Things #08] Coyotes
  7. Carnival In Coal – [Collection Prestige #04] Right Click…Have As…
  8. Menomena – [Friend And Foe #08] My My
  9. Five Pointe O – [Untitled #02] King Of The Hill
  10. Isis – [Oceanic #07] Weight
§3010 · November 7, 2008 · (No comments) · Tags: , ,

More Information Than You Require More Information Than You Require by John Hodgman
Publisher: Dutton
Year: 2008
Pages: 368

You may recall that I was less than impressed with John Hodgman’s previous book, The Areas of My Expertise. At the time, at least in comparison to his appearances on The Daily Show, which were concise and humorous, I found his writing to be a little too unfocused, despite its stated aim as a compendium of entirely fictional (and apparently random) knowledge. This opinion got me flak from what appeared to be a vocal supporter, but I persist in my assertion that the book was subpar.

Unfortunately, I must issue a substantially similar opinion this time around. More Information Than You Require is in every sense of the word a continuation of The Areas of My Expertise—even going so far as to number its pages starting with the last page of its successor.

Here, I think, is my issue with Hodgman’s books: almost always, when I laugh, it’s because of the sheer randomness of the text. Otherwise, I don’t see what Hodgman’s trying to accomplish: I don’t feel as though the book is satire, because he’s not really pointing out any kind of absurdity in the things he talks about. Neither is it parody, except in a very general sense as it pertains to reference books. So what is Hodgman doing? The most impressive and clever thing he accomplish is constant self-reference, including reference to his previous book. If ever someone cultivated a thriving ecosystem of in-jokes and footnotes, it’s Hodgman, but the end result is ultimately fulsome: the jokes of pomposity and grandiloquence is only funny for a limited time and in a limited scope, after which it becomes a rather tedious exercise in the occasional droll witticism. This sequel lacks even the novelty of Hodgman’s first compendium, since it’s really nothing more than another comparable slice of the same shtick.

If you liked Areas of My Expertise, you will almost assuredly enjoy More Information Than You Require; if you didn’t, the opposite holds true. If you are new to John Hodgman, I can’t personally recommend his books, but there’s certaintly no accounting for taste. If the two, I think Areas of My Expertise is the more novel, so you may want to start with that one.

§2987 · November 7, 2008 · 3 comments · Tags: , , , , ,