Confessions of an Economic Hitman
-
Confessions of an Economic Hitman
by John Perkins - Publisher: Plume
- Year: 2004/2005
- Pages: 303
- See the rest of this year's listings
- What is 52 Books in 52 Weeks?
- №10
I don’t recall at what point I became aware of John Perkin’s tell-all exposé on the seedy underworld of global politics, but while the idea was intriguing, it sounded a bit too exaggerated for my tastes, and I left it well enough alone. Finally, I could not resist the temptation to read this tome by Perkins, who is referred to as a “frothing conspiracy theorist” (more on this later) but praised by a multitude of readers.
SuperFreakonomics
-
SuperFreakonomics
by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner - Publisher: William Morrow
- Year: 2009
- Pages: 287
- See the rest of this year's listings
- What is 52 Books in 52 Weeks?
- №63
When Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner published Freaknomics several years ago, they gained a bit of mainstream fame as popular science writers (think Malcolm Gladwell). They also stirred up controversy with their assertion that abortion lowers the crime rate, which also raised a ruckus for poor Bill Bennett, who didn’t deserve it for once.
For better or worse, Levitt and Dubner have drummed up a sequel, dubbed—faster, better, stronger—SuperFreakonomics, a title that is preposterous and sensationalist, but which the authors readily admit.
The Post-American World
-
The Post-American World
by Fareed Zakaria - Publisher: W. W. Norton
- Year: 2008
- Pages: 288
- See the rest of this year's listings
- What is 52 Books in 52 Weeks?
- №69
This book briefly flared into the limelight this campaign season when Barack Obama was seen reading it. It also inspired yet another dumbshit chain email asserting that the book was “a Muslim’s view of a defeated America!” Like most of the dreck which comes out of this specious subculture of conservative email forwarding, it’s utter nonsense.
In defense of open models
Andrew Keen has no idea how open models work.
In his latest article, he pontificates that the recent economic downturn is a death knell for community-supported or community-built programs/sites/&c.
So how will today’s brutal economic climate change the Web 2.0 “free” economy? It will result in the rise of online media businesses that reward their contributors with cash; it will mean the success of Knol over Wikipedia, Mahalo over Google, TheAtlantic.com over the HuffingtonPost.com, iTunes over MySpace, Hulu over YouTube Inc., Playboy.com over Voyeurweb.com, TechCrunch over the blogosphere, CNN’s professional journalism over CNN’s iReporter citizen-journalism… The hungry and cold unemployed masses aren’t going to continue giving away their intellectual labor on the Internet in the speculative hope that they might get some “back end” revenue. “Free” doesn’t fill anyone’s belly; it doesn’t warm anyone up.
There are really two broad fallacies that need addressing here. The first is Keen’s use of the word “open source,” which here is a misnomer. He never mentions Linux, Apache, or other open source programs which always have and will continue to have a dedicated base of programmers, most of whom work on it in their spare time, without any remuneration except personal pride and the esteem of their peers. It need hardly be noted that an economic downtown is likely to increase interest in open-source software, as it likely reduces operating costs for businesses.
Wednesday’s Word LI
- mortgage
- n. A special form of secured loan where the purpose of the loan must be specified to the lender, to purchase assets that must be fixed (not movable) property such as a house or piece of farm land. The assets are registered as the legal property of the borrower but the lender can seize them and dispose of them if they are not satisfied with the manner in which the repayment of the loan is conducted by the borrower. Once the loan is fully repaid, the lender loses this right of seizure and the assets are then deemed to be unencumbered.
With all the national hullabaloo lately about America’s economy going down the shitter, Wall Street brokers rending their garments and gnashing their teeth, and the term “subprime mortgage” acquiring an opprobrium usually reserved for choice monosyllables with a surplus of dentals and velar plosives. But “mortgage” has been one of those words that is surprisingly unknown in an etymological sense.
Old French morgage, from mort gaige, literally means “dead pledge.” Mort is easy enough, traced back to the Latin mori, “to die.” Gage is a slightly less obvious root that came to Old French through Frankish from P.Gmc. *wadiare. This is the same transformation which produced our modern “wage,” which is literally a pledge to pay (a salary).
Our English “pledge,” however, is from an entirely different origin. It’s from the 14th-century plege, meaning a “surety” or “bail,” once again from Frankish (*plegan) and ultimately from Germanic. It had early connotations of a promise made by drinking, though ironically it later became (“The Pledge”) a term of Temperance.
Republican logic
See if you can intuit this one:
- A bailout plan, created in the White House and pushed extensively by President Bush, is sent to Congress.
- A majority (≈60%) of Democrats voted for the bill.
- A majority (≈67%) of Republicans voted against the bill.
- “Republicans blamed [Nancy Pelosi]… for the vote’s failure.”
What?
Subscribe