GNOME logo

In January 2007 I published the GNOME Audio Player Shootout, a simple comparison of the options available to GNOME users for handling their day-to-day playback needs. It proved to be so popular that in December of 2008 I did a followup, excluding some abandoned players and adding some new ones. Though it hasn’t been quite two years yet, I thought it was time for another look at the state of audio players in the GNOME ecosystem.

This time around, I’ve got a heavy focus on new players, as there have been a number of new arrivals since my last shootout that show a lot of promise. This article will cover (in no particular order):

  • Rhythmbox (0.12.8)
  • Exaile (3.2.0)
  • Banshee (1.7.4)
  • Quod Libet (2.2.1)
  • Guayadeque (0.2.6-svn1186)
  • DeaDBeeF (0.4.1)
  • aTunes (2.0.1)
  • xnoise (0.1.10)
  • GMusicBrowser (1.1.5-git)
  • Aqualung (0.9~beta11)

All testing was done using an up-to-date Ubuntu Lucid x64 with all necessary repositories added, including some PPAs for the last versions of these players. Considered but not reviewed were Decibel Audio Player (hasn’t changed appreciably since last time), Gejengel (so unstable as to be unusable), and Bluemindo (still too simple to be useful).

Please note that this article necessarily incorporates some of my own biases. I am an avowed foobar2000 fan and you will notice that I tend to favor the utility-minded players over the media centers and iTunes clones. This article should still be useful, even if your own inclinations are different from mine.

§5650 · August 29, 2010 · 7 comments · Tags: , , , ,

Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12


right
n. Designating the side of the body which is positioned to the east if one is facing north.
n. Pertaining to the political right; conservative.
left
n. Designating the side of the body which is positioned to the west if one is facing north.
n. Pertaining to the political left; liberal.

“Left” and “right” are such common words that we don’t often realize just how significant they are; but like all simple words, they tend to be venerable, storied, and much more interesting than it may first appear.

I was inspired to do these words because of an e-mail forward joking about “left” and “right” politics by quoting Ecclesiastes:

A wise man’s heart is at his right hand; but a fool’s heart at his left.

Read more…

§5883 · August 18, 2010 · (No comments) · Tags: , ,

Although of Course You End Up Becoming Yourself Although of Course You End Up Becoming Yourself by David Lipsky
Publisher: Broadway
Year: 2010
Pages: 352

Just under two years ago, David Foster Wallace killed himself, leaving behind a legacy that included—and perhaps unfairly focused on—his magnum opus, the 1’000+ page Infinite Jest. Though I happened to appreciate Wallace’s nonfiction (see Consider the Lobster) even more than his fiction, he was equally adept at both forms—at any form, to be honest.

When Wallace killed himself, the internet was full of retrospectives, but the one I recall as being the most beautiful was “The Lost Years and Last Days of David Foster Wallace”, which David Lipsky wrote for Rolling Stone. When I read, shortly after, that Lipsky would pen would of two upcoming biographies about Wallace, I was enthusiastic to say the least. Although of Course You End Up Becoming Yourself isn’t a biography, if one wanted to be pedantic, but it’s as close to an unfiltered volume of DFW as we are likely to get.

Read more…

§5820 · August 9, 2010 · (No comments) · Tags: , , , , ,

In Search of Time: The Science of a Curious Dimension In Search of Time: The Science of a Curious Dimension by Dan Falk
Publisher: Thomas Dunne Books
Year: 2008
Pages: 352

I’ve always had an affinity for science fiction about time travel; to the limited degree that I comprehend it, I like hard science too. Something about the fundamental and inscrutable nature of time intrigues me, and so picking up Dan Falk’s In Search of Time wasn’t a difficult decision. It didn’t turn out to be the book I was expecting, but it was enjoyable enough regardless.

Read more…

§5789 · August 6, 2010 · 2 comments · Tags: , , , , ,

codicil
n. An addition or supplement that explains, modifies, or revokes a will or part of one.

Codicil is known mostly as a legal term (for which see the official definition), but in practice is has come to refer figuratively to any addition or addendum, often with a quasi-scholarly connotation. Its use in English dates from the 15th century, when it came into the language from the French codicille and Latin codicillus , which referred to a short writing or small tablet (used for writing). It’s no surprise that the word’s origin is French/Latinate, since most of our legal terms come from that very source. Because French and Latin was, for a long time, the preferred language of the scholars and the judicial system after the Norman Conquest, our common words from that vocabulary Latinate almost to a one.

Codicil is a diminutive form of codex, which was Latin for both “tree trunk” and “book”, and which also gave rise to the more familiar code, initially in the form of a code of law or code of ethics, but which now refers to everything from the cheat code in Contra to the source code that I write at work.

Read more…

§5595 · August 4, 2010 · (No comments) · Tags: , ,