For the full list of books, see here.

I’m afraid I lack the time for a full-featured wrap-up, but I’ve summarized the relevant information into a table of handy stats. In short, the general makeup of this past year’s books was about the same, with slightly fewer re-reads.

52 Books in 52 Weeks, 2009 statistics
Key Value
Books Read 65
Total Pages 22’564
Shortest Book 134
Longest Book 800
Average Length 347.14
Worst Book Twilight
Best Book Tie: Three Farmers On Their Way to a Dance; Death From the Skies!
Nonfiction Books 35
Fiction Books 30
New Reads 55
Re-reads 10
§4808 · December 31, 2009 · 4 comments · Tags: , ,

Where Men Win Glory: The Odyssey of Pat Tillman Where Men Win Glory: The Odyssey of Pat Tillman by Jon Krakauer
Publisher: Doubleday
Year: 2009
Pages: 416

There was a time—ever so briefly—when Pat Tillman dominated the news cycle. Actually, there were two times: one, when the football semi-star joined the military and become a posterboy for patriotism and self-sacrifice, and another when he died via friendly fire, becoming yet another It’s a Mad Mad Mad Mad Mad World story in a long string of nonsensical happenings on the other side of the world.

Read more…


tremendous
adj. Notable for its size, power, or excellence.
adj. Extremely large (in amount, extent, degree, etc.) or great

Tremendous comes to us from the Latin tremendus, meaning “fearful, terrible.” Literally, it means that the described object is “to be trembled at”; the PIE base *tre[s|m], meaning “tremble,” has given rise not only to our modern “to tremble” through the Latin tremere (and hence the origin of “tremendous”), but also “terrible” as well, from terrere (“to inspire fear”). Tremendous and terrible are, therefore, more or less the same words, even though we probably wouldn’t realise it as speakers of Modern English.

Tremendous in the sense of “awful, dreadful, terrible” is a 17th-century construction. It began to take on other meanings—size, for instance, as well as superlatively good—in the early 18th century. In doing so, it lost most of its qualifying characteristics in favor of quantifying ones.

Oddly enough, one of tremendous’s synonyms, enormous, experienced something like this phenomenon as well. The manner in which most of us use it—to denote a massive size—is an old form, dating from the mid-16th century, from the Latin enormis (read: not normal); in that respect the word has been fairly stable. Prior to that, however, the word referred to outrageousness or wickedness, and that sense is still retained in the word “enormity,” which I don’t hesitate to note has fallen into disuse. As often as not, when someone uses the word “enormity” they are referring to size.

There was a notable shift in the early-to-mid-19th century in the usage of these words; they lost much of their connotations and became mere intensifiers. Consider “awful,” which is literally that which inspires “awe,” the aforementioned “tremendous,” and “terribly” in its adjective form. Even “terrific,” which is another Latinate word which originally meant “to inspire terror,” has become either a positive phrase like tremendous, or a general purpose intensifier.

Our other “size” words are often more recent constructions or have less interesting histories.. Gigantic is a straightforward derivation of “giant,” though it looks more like the Latin gagantem (gagas is “giant”). Humongous is nonsense word from the 1960s which mixes “huge” and “monstrous.” “Ginormous” (from “gigantic” and “enormous”), a very recently-popular construction, attests to this same phenomenon.

Ironically enough, our simplest words for size are the most mysterious. “Huge” is from Old French ahuge, whose origins are lost to us; “big” is a 13/14th-century word from Northern England, with potentially Scandanavian but otherwise unknown etymology. “Large,” which is a straightfoward Latinate word originally meaning “bountiful” gained its alternate sense of size around this same point.

§4776 · December 16, 2009 · 3 comments · Tags: , ,

JPod

JPod JPod by Douglas Coupland
Publisher: Bloomsbury
Year: 2007
Pages: 567

JPod is considered the spiritual successor to Douglas Coupland’s Microserfs, a boom-era tech novel about the joys and perils of working at Microsoft in its heyday. As you can read in my review of the book, I was not particularly fond of it; perhaps I simply can’t appreciate Coupland’s treatment of that era. I personally found Show Stopper! to be a more interesting and engaging book; it dealt with the same subject matter, but it was a historical treatment and not a romp through absurdist humor only vaguely related to its purported subject.

Read more…

§4747 · December 14, 2009 · (No comments) · Tags: , , , ,

SuperFreakonomics SuperFreakonomics by Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner
Publisher: William Morrow
Year: 2009
Pages: 287

When Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner published Freaknomics several years ago, they gained a bit of mainstream fame as popular science writers (think Malcolm Gladwell). They also stirred up controversy with their assertion that abortion lowers the crime rate, which also raised a ruckus for poor Bill Bennett, who didn’t deserve it for once.

For better or worse, Levitt and Dubner have drummed up a sequel, dubbed—faster, better, stronger—SuperFreakonomics, a title that is preposterous and sensationalist, but which the authors readily admit.

Read more…

§4749 · December 11, 2009 · (No comments) · Tags: , , , , ,