<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Linux 2.6 filesystem benchmarks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heliologue.com/2008/03/21/linux-26-filesystem-benchmarks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heliologue.com/2008/03/21/linux-26-filesystem-benchmarks/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 03:16:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://heliologue.com/2008/03/21/linux-26-filesystem-benchmarks/#comment-154787</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heliologue.com/?p=2015#comment-154787</guid>
		<description>Ext3 has generally aged like a fine wine.  From what I&#039;ve seen of ext4, it&#039;ll rock even harder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ext3 has generally aged like a fine wine.  From what I&#8217;ve seen of ext4, it&#8217;ll rock even harder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conor</title>
		<link>http://heliologue.com/2008/03/21/linux-26-filesystem-benchmarks/#comment-154783</link>
		<dc:creator>Conor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 17:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heliologue.com/?p=2015#comment-154783</guid>
		<description>Awesome link, thanks for it. I&#039;m surprised and pleased at how well ext3 fared! Reiser, though, as expected, seemed to rock the reads and suck on the writes.

Really made me want to expand my array to get a sexy rate like 100MB/s on read!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome link, thanks for it. I&#8217;m surprised and pleased at how well ext3 fared! Reiser, though, as expected, seemed to rock the reads and suck on the writes.</p>
<p>Really made me want to expand my array to get a sexy rate like 100MB/s on read!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

