Eldest Eldest by Christopher Paolini
Publisher: Knopf Books
Year: 2005
Pages: 704

You may be interested to read my review of the previous book in this series, Eragon

Despite an essentially mediocre start with Eragon, I decided out of sheer petulance to read the next book in the series; the plot may be derivative, but I am still curious as to its eventual end, even though I can guess where it will end.

Eldest picks up immediately after the conclusion of Eragon, after a ferocious battle. It finds the main character, Eragon, severely wounded and disillusioned. Immediately, tragedy besets his group, the Varden, as their leader is killed. After a few chapters of politicizing, Eragon travels to the land of the Elves to continue his training.

Like its predecessor, Eldest‘s pace is slow, detailing Eragon’s training, his pathetic attempts at romance with the elf princess Arya, and a number of asides that attempt to flesh out Paolini’s invented world of Alagaësia and its various constituent cultures. It also follows a number of other narrative strands, including the leader of the Varden, Nasuada, and Eragon’s cousin, Roran. Only at the end, with its climactic battle, does the pace pick up. Paolini’s received a fair amount of criticism for this, though it must be noted that at least one of his primary sources, Tolkien, was guilty of this as well. One might think that children wouldn’t bother with such a slow book, but the numbers don’t lie: Eldest sold 425’000 copies in its first week. Paolini gets a lot of criticism in general for coming off as Tolkien Lite, but I argue now, as I argued before, that these are technically books for young readers, who can’t or won’t be able to appreciate the more detailed or elaborate books of Tolkien, McCaffrey, or any of the other authors from which Paolini plunders his ideas.

One thing that does bother me is the inconsistency of Eragon’s development as a dragon rider. If I may borrow a term from science, then Paolini resorts to “punctuated equilibrium,” where Eragon is weak and whiny for a while, and then by some epiphany, revelation, or bit of magic, he sudden becomes much stronger or much wiser. It’s a cheap device for character development; also cheap is the degree to which Paolini resorts to dramatic irony. It’s never truly explicit, but by means of a fortune-telling in the first book, among other things, the reader is generally aware of Eragon’s frequent folly, and can predict things that consistent thwart the character’s ability to predict. It’s a problem only exacerbated by the book’s slow pace, since a reader might be well aware of a likely outcome, only to reader for several more chapters before the apparent dullards in the book finally catch on.

I sound harsh, I know. There is a very definite divide between those who should and should not read the book. If you’re well-read enough to know how much Paolini borrows from other writers, then you shouldn’t read the book in the first place; or, at least, you shouldn’t expect to like it. However, I still maintain that these books are a good primer for younger readers.

§2027 · March 31, 2008 · (No comments) · Tags: , , , , ,

Wordpress

After 6+ months of steady development, WordPress 2.5 has finally been released, with a number of new features, including a media library and the first administration panel redesign since 2.0.

In addition, the main WordPress website has been redesigned to match.

Congratulations to all the hackers, testers, and volunteers who helped it happen.

§2026 · March 29, 2008 · 2 comments · Tags: , , , ,

Saint Francis of Assisi Saint Francis of Assisi by G.K. Chesterton
Publisher: Image
Year: 1987
Pages: 160

I didn’t simply decide on day to big up G.K. Chesterton’s paean to St. Francis of Assisi. Actually, the slim tome was given to me by my employer, a Franciscan institution. Though I have relatively little personal interest in St. Francis’ life, I am also loathe to let a book go unread.

Chesterton was perhaps one of the more well-accepted Christian apologists; his was supposedly the catalyst for the trite and ridiculous C.S. Lewis, a later apologist with all the intellectual weight of a circus clown.

For Chesterton, better known for his other writing such as the interesting The Man Who Was Thursday, a major inspiration to his Christianity and eventual Catholicism was Saint Francis of Assisi. This book is Chesterton’s attempt to explain his reverence for both Saint Francis and the saint as the Church writ small—that is, a highly idealized Church.

What I find most intriguing/appealing about Chesterton’s writing is that he preempts blanket criticism immediately by proclaiming that he doesn’t mind dislike as long as it is “intelligent dislike.” He makes no attempt to shy away from the historical atrocities and excesses of his Church, but oddly defends the Crusades, for instance, by more or less reducing the followers of “Mahomet” to bogeymen who needed a good thrashing. He pretends that the Church was the bearer of light in the Dark Ages, rather than a integral part of them. He pretends that as soon as Pope Gregory the Seventh “reformed” the church, everything seemed to be just dandy.

But the majority of the book’s text was about Saint Francis, at the feet of which Chesterton prostrates himself, fawning and fellating. The author’s admitted focus is making Francis palatable to “secular sympathizers,” and certain he makes a good case for Francis qua liberal democrat and pioneer of social justice, to which we all may raise a glass in approval. He doesn’t so much say that Francis could have been mentally disturbed, only going so far as to say that Francis’ asceticism “can be ignored or dismissed as a contemporary accident.”

I can appreciate Chesterton’s spirited praise of Francis, though I am amazed that so much rather circular verbiage can be heaped around a single subject. In short, the book is a curious one, neither a best or breed nor waste of paper. It’s appeal is likely limited: unless you’re a Francis fan, a Chesterton devotee, or a general devourer of Christian apologetics, it seems little more than a trifle.

§2023 · March 29, 2008 · 3 comments · Tags: , , , ,

The “Command Line Interface” edition.

Friday Random Ten

  1. Ours – [Precious #01] Kill the Band
  2. Gifts From Enola – [Loyal Eyes Betrayed the Mind #01] Behind Curtains Closing
  3. The Gathering – [How To Measure A Planet? CD1 #08] Marooned
  4. Insomnium – [In the Halls of Awaiting #07] Shades of Deep Green
  5. Meshuggah – [obZen #07] Pineal Gland Optics
  6. Ben Christophers – [My Beautiful Demon #03] Before The Winter Parade
  7. Regina Spektor – [Begin To Hope #07] Après Moi
  8. Agua De Annique – [Air #10] Come Wander With Me
  9. Ottorino Respighi – [Pines of Rome - Fountains of Rome - Roman Festivals #03] The Pines of the Janiculum
  10. Coldplay – [A Rush of Blood to the Head #07] Green Eyes
§2025 · March 28, 2008 · (No comments) · Tags: , ,

cornucopia
n. a goat’s horn endlessly overflowing with fruit, flowers and grain; or full of whatever its owner wanted
n.. a hollow horn- or cone-shaped object, filled with edible or useful things

Cornucopia comes from the Latin cornu, and it the direct etymological ancestor of the modern English “horn.” It’s one of many “c-” words in Latin that shifted their initial consonant to an “h”—see also centum/hundred and caput/head and cordum/heart. Funnily enough, while Latin C’s became English H’s, Latin G’s became English C’s; for example, granum/corn and genus/kin and ager/acre.

The second part, copia is obviously related to the modern English “copious,” and means “plenty” or “abundance.” Very literally, we are talking about a “horn of plenty,” the ugly woven thing stuffed with gourds that you see around Thanksgiving.

When Dan Brown talked about it in The Da Vinci Code, he sort of got it right: its mythological origins do lie with Zeus: Amalthea, his nurse, raised the baby god on goats milk, and he in return gave her the horn of the goat, which had magical powers to stay filled with whatever the bearer desired. A less-often mentioned story is how either Amalthea’s skin, or that of her goat, became the covering for Zeus’s aegis. What Brown didn’t get right was the whole Baphomet/fertility rites nonsense, and of course my thoughts about Dan Brown and his excremental writing are a matter of public record.

§2006 · March 26, 2008 · (No comments) · Tags: , , ,