The “November’s over already?” edition.

Friday Random Ten

  1. Solomon Burke – [Don't Give Up On Me #03] Diamond In Your Mind
  2. Beirut – [Gulag Orkestar #03] Brandenburg
  3. John Vanderslice – [Emerald City #03] The Parade
  4. Maudlin of the Well – [My Fruit Psychobells #04] The Ocean, The Kingdom And The Temptation
  5. Ours – [Distorted Lullabies #05] Miseryhead
  6. Live – [Secret Samadhi #11] Merica
  7. The Pineapple Thief – [What We Have Sown #06] What We Have Sown
  8. Radiohead – [In Rainbows #04] Weird Fishes/Arpeggi
  9. The Bad Plus – [Prog #01] Everybody Wants To Rule The World
  10. Ulver – [Shadows of the Sun #01] Eos

The sea nymphs glide through courseless heaven:

  • The Smedley Log (Sarah MacLachlan one’s of those artists whom everybody likes but no one wants to admit to liking)
§1933 · November 30, 2007 · 1 comment · Tags: , ,

In Don Reisinger’s case, it’s miss. I’m struck by the inanity of his recent article about Vista, even though I might agree with it in theory.

But I digress. Although Windows XP running Service Pack 3 is almost twice as fast as Windows Vista running SP1 and major hardware manufacturers are still selling XP machines out of desire for once, Microsoft wants to hold on to Vista regardless of where it takes the company. Will it force the company into a tailspin? I think it already has. Will it get worse? Possibly. But if Microsoft heeds my warnings and follows some of the tips I will outline below, Windows Vista may not be the utter failure I think it will be if nothing changes.

Of course Microsoft is going to hang onto Vista. Does he really think they’re going to just drop the product, say “Oh, sorry, guys, that one sucked. Check back in three years, and we’ll try to have gotten it right”? Here’s what no one seems to realize: Microsoft doesn’t live on the quality of it’s operating system. It lives on its entrenched market share and the breadth of software available for the platform. Vista can be as bad as it wants, but most OEMs bundle it regardless; those that don’t will probably do so in the next year. Most software will work unmodified on Vista; newer hardware generally has drivers available. Vista won’t make or break Microsoft because most people are too lazy to bother switching. They’ll upgrade when the time comes or someone else upgrades for them. Eventually, Microsoft will force the issue, and that’ll be that. Perhaps Microsoft’s 90% grip on the market will lose a couple of percentage points to Apple or Linux, but they’ll still rake in the dough from people buying Office 2007 (regardless of the Ribbon UI) and the same corporate shills buying bulk licenses of Vista. It’s inevitable, and opining about a “tailspin” is both lazy and ridiculous.

But Don doesn’t leave it there. He offers handy “tips” to Microsoft that they’ll ignore at their peril.

Read more…

§1937 · November 29, 2007 · 1 comment · Tags: , , , , ,

The Undertaking The Undertaking by Thomas Lynch
Publisher: Penguin
Year: 1998
Pages: 224

My reading The Undertaking is all Lauren‘s fault. I had, surprisingly, never heard of Lynch until she mentioned him, and then I was struck with a morbid curiosity for what a third-generation funeral director (they prefer that term to the antiquated “undertaker,” despite the appropriateness of the name, and to the rather called “mortician”) would have to say. Add to this that Lynch is a semi-celebrated poet, and you have the makings for either an excellent book about death and dying or an overly maudlin piece of smarmily-constructed prose better left for brochures and sympathy cards.

The good news for everybody is that Lynch usually stays pretty solidly in the former case. Only occasionally did The Undertaking stray into sentimental weeping and wringing of hands, usually when it took on the aires of the self-righteous and unforgivably saccharine Paradox of our Time. Thankfully, those moments are few and far between, and Lynch spares us the creative nadirs of the truly obnoxious.

The crux of Lynch’s book, and I quote, is this: “The dead don’t care.” He says it a number of times. “The dead don’t care.”

This is important, and it’s a theme that runs throughout the short essays of the book. The funereal process, from the body preparation to the ceremonial rites to the lowering of the body, is done entirely for the benefit of the living. The attendant rituals of death are merely a process by which we assign meaning to the departed and signify in some way their relationship to us. The body itself can be fed to dogs, and it wouldn’t materially affect a damn thing.

This all sounds quite crass so far, I’m sure. But let me assure you that Lynch—used to, I’m sure, being delicate—treats the topic with a bit more poetry and dignity. Some of it is the nuts and bolts of the mortician’s life, and much grand theororizing about the nature of humanity as it pertains to our imminent demise. Most, though, is Lynch sharing with his readers what a lifetime of obsequies has taught him about people. The most touching, perhaps, is the very last chapter, when he muses rather sadly about his own death, planning his rites of burial, and then catches himself, remembering the advice of his own father, and decides to leave the details to his own children—he, after all, will not care one way or the other.

At 200 pages, this won’t take you very long to read. While the musings of a mortician are not perhaps what you would consider enjoyable reading, I stress that Lynch is actually an excellent writer, and that the vast majority of the work is a pleasure to read. Give it a try. And hattip to Lauren.

§1936 · November 28, 2007 · 1 comment · Tags: , , , ,

The New Time Travelers The New Time Travelers by David Toomey
Publisher: W.W. Norton
Year: 2007
Pages: 320

I’ve always been fascinated with time travel. Or time in general. When I was about 11 or 12, I wrote a series of three short stories that centered around time travel (one involved dinosaurs, very vaguely reminiscent of “Thunder of Erebus”; another was called “Lüp” and was a lot like the “Cause and Effect” episode of Star Trek: TNG, even though I hadn’t ever seen that episode), which was conceptually brilliant (my lack of writing skills notwithstanding) despite my more or less complete lack of understanding about such things. I struggled for weeks with causality paradox inherent to the Terminator films. I almost went insane trying to figure out Primer. Time travel is one of those things for which fascination isn’t at all tempered by a lack of understanding.

When I saw Toomey’s The New Time Travelers on the library shelf, a lifetime of latent interest couldn’t be ignored. It promised to be a book of the sort which manages to make hard science accessible (see also Stephen Hawking’s books). Time travel is, if nothing else, a boatload of math, which is my archnemesis. Toomey is an English teacher, if that gives you any indication of the context in which it was written. Don’t let that fool you, though: David Foster Wallace, for instance, wrote a book on the concept of infinity which was obstreperously dense. I found out only later that his undergrad degree was in math.

Toomey, though, has no such surprised. Granted, the concepts of time travel are still extraordinarily difficult to wrap one’s mind around, aided only slightly by the book’s multitude of graphs and diagrams, but Toomey is clearly trying his best to not only explain the complicated mathematics behind advanced physics, but also give historical and cultural context to the idea. The book doesn’t even broach time travel for a while: Toomey begins with H.G. Well’s The Time machine and then starts by laying a working foundation for modern physics: relatively, quantum theory, &c. are all necessary to explain the vagaries of time travel.

Of course, we’re not talking about a wild-eyed Doc Brown roaring up in the DeLorean. We’re talking about the peculiar qualities of light, and the theoretical behavior of regular matter at relativistic speeds; that is, no hopping in a machine and killing a butterfly in the Jurassic, and no blasting forward and meeting the Morlocks. The best you could do would travel in a very fast spaceship for a few years and then come back to earth to find that hundreds or thousands of years had passed (depending on how close to the speed of light you got) because of the different reference frames. For the last century, physicists have played on and off with the idea, passing thought experiments around like a doobie.

Despite being mostly theory and guesswork (time travel is the sudoku of modern physics), the idea still remains fascinating. I was impressed at the thorough but approachable treatment that Toomey gave it. if you want more than Wikipedia can provide on the subject, give the book a try.

§1932 · November 26, 2007 · 1 comment · Tags: , , , , ,

The “Stuffed” edition.

Friday Random Ten

  1. Regina Spektor – [Begin To Hope #01] Fidelity
  2. Änglagård – [Epilog #06] Saknadens Fullhet
  3. Pineapple Thief – [Variations On A Dream #05] The Bitter Pill
  4. Ben Christophers – [My Beautiful Demon #06] Sunday
  5. The Tea Party – [Splendor Solis #11] The Majestic Song
  6. The Smashing Pumpkins – [Machina #04] I of the Mourning
  7. The Dillinger Escape Plan – [Calculating Infinity #01] Sugar Coated Sour
  8. Aerial – [The Sentinel CD1 #05] You Will All Die, All Things Will
  9. Apostle of Hustle – [Folkloric feel #10] They Shoot Horses, Don’t They?
  10. Turing Machine – [Zwei #03] Bitte Baby Bitte

Jag tror att under stenen finns en gång som leder till himmelriket

§1934 · November 23, 2007 · 1 comment · Tags: , ,