<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Then We Came to the End</title>
	<atom:link href="http://heliologue.com/2007/04/21/then-we-came-to-the-end/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://heliologue.com/2007/04/21/then-we-came-to-the-end/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:33:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://heliologue.com/2007/04/21/then-we-came-to-the-end/#comment-85914</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jun 2007 03:39:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heliologue.com/blog/2007/04/21/then-we-came-to-the-end/#comment-85914</guid>
		<description>You seem to be the kind of person who would have a low threshold for that kind of rhetorical modernism.  Even I, a self-professed literary snob, find it a bit obnoxious after a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to be the kind of person who would have a low threshold for that kind of rhetorical modernism.  Even I, a self-professed literary snob, find it a bit obnoxious after a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://heliologue.com/2007/04/21/then-we-came-to-the-end/#comment-85444</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jun 2007 21:23:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heliologue.com/blog/2007/04/21/then-we-came-to-the-end/#comment-85444</guid>
		<description>Ultimately I didn&#039;t like it. The &quot;we&quot; got old, and required some cheating. And the chronology-challenged, stream-of-consciousness narrative drove me nigh bonkers. For some people, that rambling style is a fine cup of tea, but I think it&#039;s undisciplined.

Fun in places,accurate in others, but pretentious and vastly overrated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ultimately I didn&#8217;t like it. The &#8220;we&#8221; got old, and required some cheating. And the chronology-challenged, stream-of-consciousness narrative drove me nigh bonkers. For some people, that rambling style is a fine cup of tea, but I think it&#8217;s undisciplined.</p>
<p>Fun in places,accurate in others, but pretentious and vastly overrated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://heliologue.com/2007/04/21/then-we-came-to-the-end/#comment-81079</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 18:58:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heliologue.com/blog/2007/04/21/then-we-came-to-the-end/#comment-81079</guid>
		<description>Having never worked in advertising, I can only guess.  But the &quot;corporate&quot; sort of insular thinking is not new to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having never worked in advertising, I can only guess.  But the &#8220;corporate&#8221; sort of insular thinking is not new to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://heliologue.com/2007/04/21/then-we-came-to-the-end/#comment-81057</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://heliologue.com/blog/2007/04/21/then-we-came-to-the-end/#comment-81057</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m reading this now 6/1/07. The &quot;we&quot; narrator is both a clever nod to office groupthink and an annoying gimmick. But I am counting all the ridiculous things in the book that aren&#039;t that ridiculous because I have witnessed them in reality, and as I am counting on my fingers, I will soon have to take my shoes off to continue. And I&#039;m only on page 56.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reading this now 6/1/07. The &#8220;we&#8221; narrator is both a clever nod to office groupthink and an annoying gimmick. But I am counting all the ridiculous things in the book that aren&#8217;t that ridiculous because I have witnessed them in reality, and as I am counting on my fingers, I will soon have to take my shoes off to continue. And I&#8217;m only on page 56.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

