Pants are the real terrorists.
oh, awesome! I remember that picture.
The things you find when you go through site archives.
May I ask why?
From the obvious sexual context of nakedness to something as innocent as the “little boy pee” (the phenomenon where young boys will insist on pulling their pants down to their ankles or even taking them off entirely when they go to a urinal), there’s a primordial appeal to pantslessness. Or nakedness in general—whatever.
My rejection of pants stems from my insistence that they are a bourgeois convention, inherently limiting to the members, and entirely socionormative.
(Hint: the second paragraph is me joking)
Mail (will not be published) (required)