Subscribe
Recent Comments
-
Nice review, Ben. I actually hadn’t heard of this book, but I might have to look for it. True SF...
-
If you mean the current, theme, I can’t take the credit for that. It’s Renegade, by...
-
I’ve just stumbled upon your site and wanted to tell you how great I think your...
-
just found out about the other book myself, waiting for it to be delivered. i dont blame you for...
-
It’s interesting that the filmmakers (or the screenwriter) made the decision to approach the...
-
abou
/ Friday, October 6th, 2006Ha!
Amanda
/ Friday, October 6th, 2006I agree.
Pants are the real terrorists.
ffanatic
/ Friday, October 6th, 2006oh, awesome! I remember that picture.
Ben
/ Saturday, October 7th, 2006The things you find when you go through site archives.
Aleksandersen
/ Friday, October 13th, 2006May I ask why?
Ben
/ Friday, October 13th, 2006From the obvious sexual context of nakedness to something as innocent as the “little boy pee” (the phenomenon where young boys will insist on pulling their pants down to their ankles or even taking them off entirely when they go to a urinal), there’s a primordial appeal to pantslessness. Or nakedness in general—whatever.
My rejection of pants stems from my insistence that they are a bourgeois convention, inherently limiting to the members, and entirely socionormative.
(Hint: the second paragraph is me joking)