People seem to be shitting themselves over comments by William Bennett. In response to the idea that legalized abortions reduce the crime rate (by the logic that aborted babies would tend to be born in to lower class families and be more likely to break the law), he said:

I do know that it’s true that if you wanted to reduce crime, you could — if that were your sole purpose, you could abort every black baby in this country, and your crime rate would go down. That would be an impossible, ridiculous, and morally reprehensible thing to do, but your crime rate would go down. So these far-out, these far-reaching, extensive extrapolations are, I think, tricky.

If you look at the comments on the MM page, you’ll see that people are having conniption fits over this thing, of the “OH MY GOD WHAT A RACIST!!!1!” sort. Come now.

1. Blacks are disproportionately represented in the American penal system. Say what you want about the circumstances that got them there: judicial bias, social and economic inequalities, whatever; it has nothing to do with inherent racial flaws, but black people do commit more crimes, statistically speaking.

2. It may have been a poorly chosen example, but pick your own: if we kill all humans, the environment will improve; if we kill all men, crime will go down; if we burn down all fast food chains, our obesity epidemic will improve. The example was chosen because, while technically true, it would be utterly ridiculous to implement, just like Bennett said.

I’m not familiar with Bennett’s other work, and it may be that I wouldn’t agree with him any other time, but in this situation, I think the response on the Left has been dominated by histrionics. Calm down, people: what part of “morally reprehensible” don’t you get?

§778 · September 30, 2005 · 5 comments · Tags: , ,

The “Let’s see if I can stop listening to Nine Inch Nails and Aqualung long enough to do this” edition.

Friday Random Ten

  1. Darkane • A Wisdoms Breed
  2. Vast • I Don’t Have Anything
  3. Alamaailman Vasarat • Lakeus
  4. Landberk • 1st of May
  5. Tonic • If You Could Only See
  6. Radiohead • 2+2=5
  7. Gardenian • Selfproclaimed Messiah
  8. Doves • Your Shadow Lay Across My Life
  9. Empyrium • Heidestimmung: A Capella
  10. Dark Suns • Virtuous Dilemma

Favorite track: “2+2=5″ by Radiohead. Let’s be honest, Hail to the Thief is just a freaking great album.
Most impossible to pronounce band name: Alamaailman Vasarat
Most radio friendly track:: “If You Could Only See”
Most Germanic: Empyrium, almost laughably so. Warbling Teutonics, they are Though Dark Suns comes close.

[Feministe | Smedley Log | Funky, Duck]

§776 · September 30, 2005 · 2 comments · Tags:

Via Lauren, who got it from Majikthise. What of the ALA’s 100 Most Frequently Challenged Books have you read?

1. Scary Stories (Series) by Alvin Schwartz
3. I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings by Maya Angelou
5. The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn by Mark Twain
6. Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck
7. Harry Potter (Series) by J.K. Rowling
12. My Brother Sam is Dead by James Lincoln Collier and Christopher Collier
13. The Catcher in the Rye by J.D. Salinger
16. Goosebumps (Series) by R.L. Stine
21. The Great Gilly Hopkins by Katherine Paterson
24. Fallen Angels by Walter Dean Myers
27. The Witches by Roald Dahl
33. Killing Mr. Griffin by Lois Duncan
38. Julie of the Wolves by Jean Craighead George
41. To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee
47. Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keyes
56. James and the Giant Peach by Roald Dahl
70. Lord of the Flies by William Golding
73. Curses, Hexes and Spells by Daniel Cohen
84. The Adventures of Tom Sawyer by Mark Twain
96. How to Eat Fried Worms by Thomas Rockwell
99. The Terrorist by Caroline Cooney

Only 21. But, then, I didn’t read all that many childrens’ books.

§775 · September 28, 2005 · 5 comments · Tags: ,

I learned from Lauren that this week is Banned Books Week, a time of the year when everybody with a lick of sense observes the fondness that fact that attempting to suppress a piece of literature will make it more widely read. It’s perhaps the most wonderful phenomenon known to man.

According to the ALA website, the following are the most challenged books of 2004:

  • “The Chocolate War” for sexual content, offensive language, religious viewpoint, being unsuited to age group and violence
  • “Fallen Angels” by Walter Dean Myers, for racism, offensive language and violence
  • “Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture” by Michael A. Bellesiles, for inaccuracy and political viewpoint
  • Captain Underpants series by Dav Pilkey, for offensive language and modeling bad behavior
  • “The Perks of Being a Wallflower” by Stephen Chbosky, for homosexuality, sexual content and offensive language
  • “What My Mother Doesn’t Know” by Sonya Sones, for sexual content and offensive language
  • “In the Night Kitchen” by Maurice Sendak, for nudity and offensive language
  • “King & King” by Linda de Haan and Stern Nijland, for homosexuality
  • “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings” by Maya Angelou, for racism, homosexuality, sexual content, offensive language and unsuited to age group
  • “Of Mice and Men” by John Steinbeck, for racism, offensive language and violence

Kind of makes you wonder, doesn’t it? I’ve only read four of the ten (Angelou, Steinbeck, Chbosky, and Myers), and all of them except for Chbosky were wonderful (the exception would be more aptly described in scatological terms).

§772 · September 28, 2005 · 3 comments · Tags: , ,

How to Make Love Like a Porn Star How to Make Love Like a Porn Star by Jenna Jameson (with Neil Strauss)
Publisher: HarperEntertainment
Year: 2004
Pages: 592

When I heard that a porn star wrote a book, my first though was “Whatever.” Pam Anderson writes books, too, and I wouldn’t read them with somebody else’s eyeballs. But, strangely enough, I began to hear that this book was actually very interesting, and written well enough (it was a collaboration with Neil Strauss). So, my curiosity piqued, I rented it, and sure enough, the librarian (a seemingly normal 20-something[?] female) told me that she had read it and really enjoyed it. She didn’t look like a porn star, so I took it as relatively unbiased recommendation.

Parts of Jenna Jameson’s autobiography are very hard to read: for as much time as she spends talking about power dynamics, her life story is a testament to the mismanagement of power and control: a less-than-exemplary home life, followed by a tattoo-artist boyfriend, a rape, stripping, magazine shoots, and finally porn. Include recurring drug problems (first meth, then alcohol and Vicodin), sessions of power madness, and all the tales of woe that accompany trying to date as a porn star.

In short, perhaps you could have seen this whole book coming. As a success story (Jenna is now “happily married,” rich and famous, and owns her own production company), it’s depressing, considering all the stupid mistakes she made. It’s undoubtedly a prurient tome, though it falls pretty short of erotica. Not that it doesn’t try: the publishers went overboard by including photos of Jenna every other page it seemed, some involving more clothing than others. My personal feeling was that if I had wanted to see seminude photos of Jenna Jameson, I’d goddamn Google it, not get her book.

But I don’t want to turn this into a discussion of the social dynamics of porn, because that’s a whole other post or series of posts. For all its predictability, How to Make Love Like a Porn Star was a good book, at least in the sense that it was interesting. Even at 592 pages, it goes by quick (I finished it in a day), but don’t expect to garner a newfound respect for porn stars or anything. For me, it was just a reminder of every lurid Luke Ford piece ever written.

§770 · September 26, 2005 · 3 comments · Tags: