LONDON, England (Reuters) — A group of Christian protesters in Scotland has called on police to prosecute a theater company for blasphemy because it is putting on a play about a gay Jesus…

“Jesus Christ is being portrayed here as a foul-mouthed, drunken, promiscuous homosexual and that is an insult to my faith,” Green told BBC Radio.

…bwahahahahaha! If you can’t handle a stranger suggesting things about your omnipotent god, then something is seriously wrong with you. You have to love how the director responds to the “foul-mouthed, drunken promiscuous homosexual” line, though: “He is not portrayed as a drunken foulmouth.”

§457 · December 10, 2004 · 1 comment · Tags: ,

It’s that time again, when the media become choked with retrospectives and lists commemorating the best, worst, and otherwise extreme of the passing year. I’ve decided to take advantage of the saturated market and pen my own, that of a Top Ten Albums list.

It’s difficult for me to decide upon the best CDs of this year, especially because some of the albums I’ve listened to the most this year weren’t from this year at all. In fact, they ranged from just last year (Rufus Wainwright’s Want One) to 1993 (Jellyfish’s Spilt Milk) to the 70s (Raphael Orozco/RPO playing Rachmaninov’s works for piano). Still, based on the albums that did come out this year, which paled in comparison with 2003, which was the promised land of new releases, I’ll try and elucidate the best.

We’ll get the hard part out of the way first. The best album of 2004 was:

  1. Pain of Salvation – Be. This is a controversial issue. PoS started out the year with a spectacular “unplugged” release, and Be had been hyped since early 2004, haven’t been performed live in Sweden. However, many people were unhappy with Be‘s eventual release. Certainly, I didn’t like it as much as Remedy Lane or Perfect Element I. Still, after listening to it enough, it grew on me, as their other works had (see ffanatic’s review for an in-depth analysis). It’s not particularly coherent, stylistically, ranging from dirge-like soul singing, typical PoS progressive rock, spoken tracks, and folk. Part of the problem, I think, is that Daniel’s choice of topic (a god) is as great as his sociological or environmental topics before, but requires significantly more bombast, which may or may not have been a good idea. Still, Pain of Salvation delivers enough trademark hooks, deep lyricism, and old-fashioned musicianship to cement their album as my pick for the best of 2004.
  2. Nick Cave & the Bad Seeds – Abattoir Blues / The Lyre of Orpheus. Cave’s been around for a while, and while I enjoy some of his albums, I don’t like others. It isn’t really his fault: he simply likes to play with song styles from album to album. This time around, though, he’s provided listeners with a double album, heavy on the blues, gospel, and rock’n'roll influences. Songs like “Get Ready for Love” are the kind of thing you turn up really loud when you drive, pound your steering wheel, and instantly become a backup singer for. Or maybe that’s just me. In any case, AB/LO walks the fine line between Cave’s quiter, more introspective albums (No More Shall We Part) and his more raucous works that have sprinkled his career in less liberal doses.
  3. Rufus Wainwright – Want Two. To be fair, I much preferred Want One, but this album has grown on me as well. It’s quieter and darker than its predecessor, beginning with the chantlike “Agnus Dei” and ending with an 8 minute foot-tapper called “Old Whore’s Diet.” Wainwright does for pop what Michael Jackson did in the late 80s and early 90s: he makes it fun, interesting, varied, and imbues it with some depth. The album comes with a DVD of a great live performance
  4. Sleepytime Gorilla Museum – Of Natural History. Right. Take parts of Mr. Bungle (especially California), a dash of progressive wankery, a pinch of death metal, and some of the oddest, most cerebral lyrics I’ve ever heard. This sophomore manages to be even stranger and even catchier than their previous album, Grand Opening and Closing.
  5. Magyar Posse – Kings of Time. I had to work for this one: no one had it, and I finally had to order it from a small independent record shop in San Francisco. Magyar Posse are a Finnish postrock band. Kings of Time is entirely instrumental, essentially Variations on a Theme, as all seven untitled tracks play with a core melodic theme in different ways. It’s pure genius, really, if you can find it.
  6. Dillinger Escape Plan – Miss Machine. I’m not a huge fan of hardcore, or even of DEP’s earlier works, but their EP with Mike Patton doing vocal duties got me hooked. I had somewhat expected this album to be a letdown, since they have a new vocalist, but surprisingly enough, the album is catchy all the way through. The same blistering music and insane polyrhythm we’ve grown to love, but there’s been some growth: they incorporate not simply the same chugga chug-chugga playing as always, but differently styled passages as well. The new vocalist, scary-looking though he is, does a hell of a job with his range. At some points he even sounds like Trent Reznor.
  7. Isis – Panopticon. The world is split into two types of music: those who can appreciate the sort of music played by Isis and Neurosis, and those who can’t. I listen to postrock regularly, so Isis isn’t much more than a twist of the volume knob. Playing soulcrushingly-heavy, wandering music, Isis is a marriage of progressive ideas to dub, purposefully enigmatic and avant-garde. Not casual listening.
  8. Pineapple Thief – 12 Stories Down. In grand traditon of bands with silly names, Pineapple Thief rocks. They remind me of an organic Radiohead, except without pigeonholing themselves into the sort of modern-prog obtuseness that the latter has fallen prey to. I just received this album (complete with bonus disc), so my including it in a Top Ten list is a daring move, but I’ve already listened to it many times over, and it’s every bit as addictive as the last album.
  9. Aeon Spoke – Above the Buried City. Believe it or not, former Florida death metallers from Cynic are the masterminds behind this mellow soft rock band. I’ve been listening to songs from the EPs, most of which make an appearance on the new album (minus my favorite, “Sand & Foam”). Melancholic, soothing, and marvellously catchy.
  10. Arsis – A Celebration of Guilt. Some people swear by the Willowtip label. I’m not a huge fan, but this release by Arsis really grabbed me by the seat of the pants. The sound hearkens back to Heartwork-era Carcass, but louder and harder. The riffing is tight, the drumming is sharp, and it’s one of the few out & out metal albums I’ve really liked this year.

And that’s it, my top ten. There were others that only barely missed the list. Here’s a brief listing:

§455 · December 9, 2004 · 6 comments · Tags:

“We do not have proper armored vehicles to carry with us north,” Wilson said after asking again.

Rumsfeld replied that, “You go to war with the Army you have,” not the one you might want.

CNN

Didn’t Bush feed us lines about the best and most well-supplied fighting force in the world?

And, the defense chief added, armor is not always a savior in the kind of combat U.S. troops face in Iraq, where the insurgents’ weapon of choice is the roadside bomb, or improvised explosive device.

“You can have all the armor in the world on a tank and it can (still) be blown up,” Rumsfeld said.

CNN

So… because they can get blown up, too, they shouldn’t worry so much about stopping those pesky bullets?

In his opening remarks, Rumsfeld stressed that soldiers who are heading to Iraq should not believe those who say the insurgents cannot be defeated or who otherwise doubt the will of the military to win.

CNN

That’s a gross oversimplification if I ever saw one. I’ve yet to meet a person who thinks we can’t eventually “win” in Iraq. The question becomes “winning” in the middle east, which is a bit like trying to drain a swamp, only now you’ve pissed off the alligators.

§454 · December 8, 2004 · 9 comments · Tags: ,

Via Wildlink comes the Institute for Liberal Values (NZ)’s position on church and state separation.

First, we must define what we mean by the “public arena”. There is a lot of fuzzy thinking going around regarding the categories “public”, “private” and “civil society”. Some is promoted by the Left for ideological reasons. Some is promoted by the Religious Right for similar reasons.

When Maxim and others on the Religious Right lament the absence of religion in the “public arena” they are actually playing fast and loose with wording. They mean the state sector. They can only mean the state sector since “public” institutions like churches, businesses, private schools and the like actually have religious components visible. The one place that it is absent is the government.

In the real “civil society” those are private decisions. There is complete separation of church and state. The Muslim closes his shop on Friday so he can go to Mosque. The orthodox Jew celebrates his Sabbath on Saturday and the Christian closes on Sunday. The rest enjoy the full week. There is no conflict between because this is privately determined. The conflict is created when the public arena is opened to religion.

Institute for Liberal Values (NZ)

Not that every liberal didn’t know this already. It’s painfully obvious that when American fundies want God in government, they want their God, and not Allah or Gaia or the Hale-Bop comet. I’m not sure what it is, exactly, that drives fundamentalists to push so hard for an American papal state of sorts. Maybe it’s a morbid desire to proselytize, maybe a desire to marginalize the heretics and unbelievers, maybe a desperate need to validate one’s personal beliefs by mandate or legislative fiat.

I understand that a lot of Christians would probably look at this and scoff, insisting that the extent of their desire for God in government is to just leave the Ten Commandments well enough alone. Maybe they’d throw in a good word for Intelligent Design theory while they’re at it. But you know what? That’s what a church is for. Schools and city halls are for education and politics. If schools need to start teaching Creationism as a viable scientific alternative (it’s not: it’s by definition a matter of faith), then I’d better start seeing pastors give lip-service to Darwinism during their sermons. It’s only fair.

Speaking of which, Jeff over at Speedkill cites PZ Myers‘ diatribe against the twits at Free Republic. Commenting upon an article about an “evolution disclaimer” sticker attached to science textbooks in some states now, poster Lindykim says:

The source of panic for human secular/socialists is that Darwins’ theory of evolution is the foundation for their philosophical worldview and thus the sledgehammer they’ve been using against Christianity to invalidate and eradicate it from America. They can’t afford for evolutionary theory to be questioned and/or openly and critically analyzed because it’s so full of holes that a ship could be sailed through it.

We’re seeing the beginning of the end for this fairytale hocus-pocus parading as science, and good riddance to an ideological worldview that has unleashed upon our civilization misery, death, perversion, nihilism, disease, paranoia, and insanity.

LindyKim

  1. “…secular/socialists”? What sort of odd lumping of political and religious terminology is that?
  2. “…sledgehammer…. against Christianity… eradicate it from America.” Last time I checked, separatists weren’t forming secret police and storming the houses of cowering Christians. The world is not a Chick tract, for God’s sake. The only place separatists are trying to eradicate Christianity (or Judaism, or Islam, or the celebrity cult du jour is from politics, where it doesn’t belong in the first place.
  3. “…can’t afford… to be questioned and/or… critically analyzed.” This is, by definition, the way a scientific theory, such as evolutionism, comes about. Remember, evolution wasn’t handed down to us in a tome. It was proposed by Darwin, who based his idea on observation and those of his forebears and contemporaries such as Hæckel. Furthermore, evolution is not “full of holes.” That scientists don’t agree on particular aspects, or that there are some things that scientists can’t yet explain, doesn’t invalidate the entire theory, as a principle or an origin.
  4. No theist, especially one this delusional, has any right to call somebody else’s belief system “fairytale hocus-pocus.” It’s all mythology, baby.
  5. Evolutionists are responsible for misery, death, perversion, nihilism, disease, paranoia, and insanity? I guess none of those things existed in the thousands (if you’re a Young Earth Creationist) of years before Darwinian thought. Or maybe Lindykim is just too dumb to realise that atheism, or theism-science hybrids, or any other deviation from fundie ideology doesn’t make someone any less moral or good than the fundies themselves, who, let’s face it, tend to be hypocrites anyway.
§452 · December 2, 2004 · 1 comment · Tags: ,